If that's indeed the fact, then that's absolutely a failure of intelligence. neither FBI nor DHS did a threat assessment for Jan. But they also said a specific threat assessment from the FBI and DHS in the weeks before might well have persuaded Capitol Police and others to beef up security.Įddy said if there wasn't an intelligence bulletin ahead of the pro-Trump rally, that was a problem. 6 was a fast-moving event that was hard to anticipate. NPR spoke with three FBI special agents in charge around the country and four current and former DHS officials who all agreed that Jan. You know, I'm not so sure I'm going to invest $2 million into extra overtime and get a bunch of new gear for my troops." "So, if you were a consumer of that intelligence and that's all you saw. counterterrorism official and diplomat who now runs Ergo, a private intelligence firm. "They seem to have only had a couple or single sourcing," said R.P. The problem was that the threats they uncovered hadn't gone through any rigorous analysis process. National Security How Online Sleuths Identified Rioters At The Capitol
#DOES TEAM VIEWER ALLOW IVISIBLE FREE#
6 out of concern that doing so might run afoul of First Amendment free speech protections that allow people to protest and assemble peacefully.īut three law enforcement officials told NPR that this didn't stop DHS and the FBI from issuing intelligence bulletins ahead of mostly peaceful demonstrations in Portland, Ore., after the killing of George Floyd last May, before Black Lives Matter marches in Washington in early June or in anticipation of an annual convention of the Islamic Society of North America.
Some FBI officials have said that the bureau and DHS didn't produce a bulletin for Jan. The bulletins are considered a finished product - a synthesis of validated and analyzed intelligence that helps local law enforcement make informed decisions. There are 80 of them across the U.S., and one of their key responsibilities is to disseminate these kinds of intelligence bulletins. 11 attacks to improve communication and intelligence sharing among local and federal law enforcement officials. The federal government created fusion centers after the Sept.
"We received a number of reports, but they were all regarding events all around the election cycle, you know, information sharing." 6, Mike Sena, president of the National Fusion Center Association, told NPR. "I was surprised that we didn't receive any information" about Jan. National Security Federal 'Strike Force' Builds Sedition Cases Against Capitol Rioters. Instead, DHS provided a report about the "heightened threat environment during the 2020-2021 election season, including the extent to which the political transition and political polarization are contributing to the mobilization of individuals to commit violence," the DHS spokesperson said. The FBI confirmed it didn't produce one either. Local law enforcement officials see them as actionable intelligence - an early warning system to help them prepare for incoming threats.Īnd yet, for last week's deadly attack on the Capitol, an event the president himself had promised would be "wild," no formal report was ever released.Ī spokesperson from DHS' Office of Intelligence and Analysis confirmed to NPR that the agency didn't produce any threat assessment about the possibility of violence on Jan. These reports are typically written as a matter of course ahead of high-profile events. The FBI's version is known as a joint intelligence bulletin. The NYPD sent the information to Washington under the assumption it would be folded into a formal intelligence bulletin by the FBI and the Department of Homeland Security. It all indicated that there would likely be violence when lawmakers certified the presidential election on Jan.
#DOES TEAM VIEWER ALLOW IVISIBLE FULL#
It was full of what's known as raw intelligence - bits and pieces of information that turned up by scraping various social media sites. In late December, the New York Police Department sent a packet of material to the U.S. When law enforcement officials failed to anticipate that pro-Trump supporters would devolve into a violent mob, they fell victim to what one expert calls "the invisible obvious." He said it was hard for authorities to see that people who looked like them could want to commit this kind of violence.
0 kommentar(er)
